Skip to main content

Organization: Elections Alberta

Heading for My Little Corner and editorial by Shannon Peace

Referendum fatigue is real, and so is Oct. 19

If you turn the pages of this week’s issue with a sigh and feel weary at the sight of yet another referendum story, I understand. I feel it too.

This week’s paper leans more toward hard news than usual. It wasn’t planned, it’s simply how the stories came together.

There’s an article on campaign signs going missing around Pincher Creek, a look at who’s behind the signs popping up everywhere, and a report from a session where Piikani and Kainai members shared their questions about treaties and ID at the polls. Cornell Van Ryk’s opinion series continues as well, based on reader feedback. He’s a local willing to put his name beside what he believes.

The Mailbox is open to anyone who would like to respectfully share their thoughts.

Unless something significant comes up, you won’t see this much referendum coverage in one issue again.

So why keep covering it?

We hear in conversation that many people aren’t sure what they’re being asked. If that’s you, you’re in good company. A recent Angus Reid Institute survey found one in five Albertans said they found the referendum questions difficult to understand.

There are 10 questions on the ballot. Questions 1 to 9 are answered with Yes or No, and Question 10 offers a choice between two options.

Job ad for “Shootin’ the Breeze” seeks part-time and full-time staff for photography, writing, and reporting; contact publisher@shootinthebreeze.ca. Background shows printed news text and a hand holding a voice recorder.

With more than two dozen registered campaigns and a separation petition before the courts, it’s a lot to take in. Our team is doing the best it can to help, from as many angles as possible. It’s not an easy job!

My primary role right now is in fact-checking and editing. It takes time and care to check against sources and to make sure claims are attributed. It’s slow work and is why some of these stories took longer to publish.

The question that seems to cause the most confusion is Question 10. It ISN’T a vote to separate from Canada.

It asks whether Alberta should remain a province, or whether the provincial government should begin the constitutional process to hold a later, binding referendum on separation.

It asks whether Albertans want a separation vote, but it isn’t that vote.

Whatever your view, I hope you’ll take a few minutes to read the questions before marking your ballot.

Elections Alberta is independent of the provincial government and of the campaigns. The questions, rules, and how and where to vote are found on its website at elections.ab.ca.

If voting by mail, request your special ballot by Friday, Sept. 25. Completed ballots must reach Edmonton by Oct. 16. I’m aiming to return mine at least a week ahead of that deadline but my package is yet to arrive.

A bearded man in a cap smiles while playing guitar. Text promotes a Lloyd Spiegel concert at Empress Theatre, October 14, 2026, with ticket details and contact info.

Personal beliefs are clashing and there is division in our community. Being civil to one another isn’t the same as agreeing and doesn’t mean every argument holds up. It’s fine to disagree and to respectfully say so.

The same goes for the signs. Whether a sign speaks for you or not, the person who put it up is a neighbour who cares, just as you do.

Signs, speeches and newspaper stories can only do so much. On Oct. 19, it’s your ballot that counts, whichever boxes you choose to check.

On Oct. 20, the signs will come down and we’ll all still be Albertans. We’ll still live here, still be neighbours and still hold a variety of opinions.

The work after the vote will be finding our way back together as a community.

How we do that is up to us.

Alberta Separation | Independence | Bill 54, Referendums

Treaty rights, ID hurdles top concerns for First Nations voters

For some Piikani and Kainai members, the Oct. 19 referendum raises a question that isn’t on the ballot: what a provincial vote can mean for treaties signed with Canada.

For others, the harder question is whether they can prove who they are at the polls.

Both concerns came up Aug. 29, when about 30 members of the two First Nations gathered at the Fort Macleod community centre for a referendum information session billed as a chance to “be informed, be heard.”

Organizer Nicole Crowshoe Johnston’s main goal was getting First Nations voters registered and encouraging attendees to request mail-in ballots. The last day to do so is Friday, Sept. 25.

Johnston and guest speaker Stephen Carter urged a No vote on the referendum’s nine policy questions.

“Our treaty is with Canada”

One attendee asked how Alberta could enact anything affecting First Nations, “given our treaty is with Canada.”

Carter agreed, saying there “was zero discussion about what First Nations rights would look like in an independent Alberta.”

He said the referendum itself could not count as consulting First Nations.

An older couple smiles while leaning on a wooden railing outdoors, above text describing their $879 profit share from Vision Credit Union and a website link.

The premier’s office disagrees that consultation is required.

“Seven hundred thousand Albertans signed petitions asking for a referendum on this issue. The referendum question does not trigger any duty to consult,” Sam Blackett, press secretary to the premier, said in a statement to Shootin’ the Breeze.

First Nations have already taken the argument to court. Johnston said they could not rely on a few chiefs to push back against the independence movement.

“We need to stand behind the chiefs,” she said, referring to court action by the Chiefs of the Blackfoot Confederacy over treaty rights and the Crown’s duty to consult.

On May 13, the Court of King’s Bench sided with Piikani, Siksika, the Blood Tribe and Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation, quashing the chief electoral officer’s decision on Mitch Sylvestre’s separation petition on treaty rights and duty-to-consult grounds.

The province and Sylvestre appealed. The Alberta Court of Appeal granted a partial stay allowing signature verification to continue. On July 24, Elections Alberta declared the petition successful, with 222,597 verified signatures, more than the 177,732 required.

Normally, a successful petition on a constitutional question goes to the justice minister, who must refer it to cabinet for a referendum before the next provincial election. Elections Alberta says those steps are on hold pending direction from the Court of Appeal.

Sylvestre’s petition asked: “Do you agree that the Province of Alberta should cease to be a part of Canada to become an independent state?”

Poster for Pincher Creek Chamber’s 31st Annual Awards of Excellence on October 23, 2026. Ticket prices and event details are listed, with a link for tickets at PincherChamber.ca/tickets.

That question is not on the Oct. 19 ballot.

Question 10, which is on the ballot, is not a vote to separate.

It asks whether Alberta should remain a province, or whether the provincial government should begin the constitutional process required to hold a later, binding referendum on separation.

Johnston said that even if the separation question were overturned, the Oct. 19 vote and its other questions will go ahead.

Proving who you are

Several attendees described difficulties with recent changes to Alberta’s ID and driver’s licence rules. One man said his federally issued Indian Status card was not recognized when he sought a provincial ID card.

Others cited new costs including a $100 fee to replace an expired licence, plus the expense of obtaining birth certificates and marriage licences, especially for those who had lived in other provinces or the United States.

Attendees also shared practical help. One pointed to the ID program at Chinook Regional Hospital in Lethbridge. According to Alberta Health Services, it runs Wednesdays and Thursdays from 8 a.m. to noon, helping homeless, at-risk and recently housed people, as well as others served by AHS programs, get Alberta ID and health cards.

Another said people living on reserves can get help proving their identity at home. Elections Alberta’s voter brochure confirms that voters on a reserve or settlement can have an attestation filled out by “a person in a position of authority,” such as a chief or chair, office administrator or elder, who can confirm their identity and where they live.

Johnston urged attendees to request mail-in ballots to avoid long lines, and volunteers with laptops helped people register on the spot.

“Who might be next”

Other worries went beyond the ballot box.

One senior who shares a Calgary rental with two grandchildren in post-secondary studies said the family pays $3,500 a month for rent and utilities.

“On my pension, it’s a real struggle to cover food and other basic expenses,” she said. “Even getting food from the food bank is tough as it is often old and mouldy.”

Another attendee raised Question 4, which asks: Assuming that all Canadian citizens and permanent residents continue to qualify for public health care and education as they do now, do you support the Government of Alberta charging a reasonable fee or premium to individuals with a non-permanent immigration status living in Alberta for their and their family’s use of the health care and education systems?

She said that if Albertans vote to charge immigrants for health care, Indigenous people could be next, citing relatives in the United States who became homeless after being unable to pay for care.

“When we start excluding people from services based on race, we have to be careful of who might be next,” Carter said.

Who ran the session

Johnston is a Calgary resident who describes herself as a community advocate with roots in Piikani Nation.

Ace of spades card on ad for Chase the Ace at the Pincher Creek Legion

She is inspired by Tania Cameron, an Anishinaabe woman from Ontario who launched First Nations Rock the Vote in 2015. Cameron announced on Facebook Sept. 2 that Treaty 8 had hired her to educate members and mobilize communities for the Alberta referendum.

Carter has managed campaigns across the political spectrum, including for former Wildrose leader Danielle Smith, former premier Alison Redford and Calgary mayors Naheed Nenshi and Jyoti Gondek. He recently launched Alberta’s Voice. The registered third-party advertiser has raised more money than any other referendum campaign to stay in Canada.

Carter’s slogan sums up his position: Stay in Canada. Vote No to the Nine.

Though the session was promoted as a chance to receive information, Carter urged a No vote on all nine yes-or-no questions rather than explaining each one.

“If any option takes three lines to express, vote against it,” he told the audience, a line he returned to several times.

“I don’t trust Danielle Smith to do it right,” Carter said. “The nine questions remove us from Canada. They are separation questions under the guise of other topics.”

Blackett said the questions grew from the government’s Alberta Next town halls, and that “Albertans’ frustrations have been fuelled by the last 10 years of disastrous policies from Ottawa under Justin Trudeau that hurt Alberta’s economy and broke the immigration system.”

“During the Alberta Next town halls, Albertans made it clear that the status quo cannot continue. Albertans have demanded real change, and these nine questions are how we deliver it,” he said.

“Our government has been clear: we support a strong and sovereign Alberta within a united Canada. This means Alberta remaining a province of Canada while advancing provincial autonomy and fighting to undo Ottawa policies that harm Albertans and intrude on our constitutional rights.”

How to vote

The referendum is Oct. 19. Voters can cast ballots in person on voting day, at an advance poll, or by mail-in special ballot.

Special ballots must be requested by Sept. 25 and received by Elections Alberta by Oct. 16.

All 10 questions, and information on requesting a special ballot, are on Elections Alberta’s website at elections.ab.ca.

Related stories

‘Historic victory’ for Piikani as court quashes separatist petition

Piikani Nation welcomes court’s pause of separation referendum process

Treaty chiefs protest separatism at legislature rally

Alberta Separation | Independence | Bill 54, Citizen Initiative Act, Duty To Consult, First Nations, Referendums, Treaty Rights, Voter Identification, Voter Registration

Political signs that have been ripped down and punctured.

Missing referendum signs a police matter, not a town one, CAO says

Signs promoting Alberta independence have been knocked down or taken repeatedly in Pincher Creek since they went up Sept. 8, according to a volunteer with the campaign that placed them.

They asked not to be named for fear of being targeted in the community. They filed a report with RCMP on Sept. 10 for the first incident but not subsequent ones.

Pincher Creek RCMP confirm they haven’t received further complaints about damaged or removed referendum signs since then.

According to the volunteer:

—Signs near Community Hall were pulled down the evening of Sept. 9 and moved down the fence line. One was broken in half and others piled together under horse manure.

—Four signs placed in front of the library were knocked down or removed each night from Sept. 11 to 14, and replaced each following day.

—Two of four replacement signs at the library were gone the morning of Sept. 16 and four signs were taken down on Remington Avenue the same day.

—Two large signs along Highway 3 were on the ground Sept. 16 after standing the night before.

Event flyer for International Credit Union Day at Vision Credit Union on October 15, inviting community members to bring food bank donations in exchange for a wall calendar.

Shootin’ the Breeze is not aware of any damage to or removal of local signs advocating the federalist position.

What the law says

In a June 29 post on Facebook, Elections Alberta said it is responsible only for monitoring the messages on referendum advertising and ensuring advertisers include the required authorization statement.

Complaints are handled by the RCMP. Pincher Creek RCMP confirm that damaging or taking a sign can be treated as mischief or theft under the Criminal Code.

Town’s role

The Town of Pincher Creek has no power to set rules for referendum signs, or to investigate when they go missing, says chief administrative officer Konrad Dunbar.

“We want to maintain a neutral stance,” he says.

Dunbar meets with any campaign that asks. Local independence supporters met with him before Aug. 31 to go over proposed sign locations.

“It is not in our mandate — we are not allowed to direct sign placement or remove signs. But we can confirm whether the locations a third party advertiser has in mind are on public or on private land,” he says.

A 2025 provincial amendment bars municipal councils from passing bylaws or resolutions about election signs or advertisements.

Event poster for a Secondhand Dreamcar concert at the Empress Theatre on November 20, 2026, at 7:30 PM, featuring a photo of the band members.

Dunbar says that before the change, each municipality could set its own sign rules, which for a provincial vote meant a patchwork. The amendment “created equal access all across the board,” he says.

If town staff need to move a sign for safety or mowing, they either contact the organization responsible or briefly move and replace it, he says.

Waterton Avenue is part of provincial Highway 6, so provincial highway rules apply. They prohibit signs on medians and signs that obstruct sight lines, interfere with traffic signs or create other hazards.

Placement guidelines

In an Aug. 20 letter to the Town of Pincher Creek, Let Alberta Decide lawyer Keith Wilson said volunteers had been told to follow guidelines similar to Calgary’s sign rules.

According to the letter, signs should:

—Not be placed within about 15 metres of an intersection.

—Not be placed within about 10 metres of a crosswalk.

—Be at least two metres behind the curb or roadway edge where practical.

Ad for Blinds and More Fall Sale: 40% off Alta Blinds from Sept 15 to Nov 30, 2026. Living room with large windows covered by wood blinds. Contact info and locations listed.

—Not be placed on medians or traffic islands.

—Be spaced apart from similar campaign signs.

—Not block sight lines for drivers, cyclists or pedestrians.

—Not interfere with sidewalks, pathways, transit, traffic-control devices, utilities or municipal operations.

—Be securely installed and maintained.

Wilson said the campaign will remove its signs promptly after the Oct. 19 referendum.

Dunbar says the guidelines are in line with provincial highway guidelines.

He invites anyone with questions about sign placement to contact him at 403-627-3156.

Alberta Separation | Independence | Bill 54, Election Signs, Referendums

Gavel rests on sounding block on a table.

Water Not Coal asks court to overturn petition ruling

The fight over coal mining near the headwaters of the Oldman River is headed to court. Corb Lund‘s Water Not Coal campaign has asked a judge to overturn Elections Alberta‘s decision that its petition, signed by more than 200,000 Albertans, fell just short of forcing a referendum.

One of the two projects the petition targeted is Northback Holdings’ Grassy Mountain, near the Oldman headwaters in the Crowsnest Pass. The other is Valory Resources’ Blackstone project in Clearwater County, near the headwaters of the North Saskatchewan River.

The campaign filed its application for judicial review July 29 in the Alberta Court of King’s Bench, on behalf of initiative proponent Lund. It argues Elections Alberta applied verification standards stricter than the Citizen Initiative Act requires, wrongly excluding thousands of valid signatures.

The application asks the court to declare the initiative successful or, failing that, send it back to Elections Alberta for reconsideration.

“More than 200,000 Albertans signed this petition in good faith, and they deserve a fair and reasonable process,” Lund said in a statement.

“Thousands of Albertans were effectively shut out by verification processes that don’t make sense. This judicial review is about ensuring that citizens’ voices weren’t lost in technicalities.”

How the count fell short

Water Not Coal submitted 207,435 signatures to Elections Alberta on June 10. An initial count validated 196,088 — well above the 177,732 needed to force a referendum.

A second-stage verification, conducted from June 11 to July 2, dropped that number to 172,088, leaving the campaign 5,644 signatures short. It was the first citizen initiative petition verified with scrutineers present, a change introduced through Bill 23, the Justice Statutes Amendment Act, 2026.

Get Stuff’d meat and seafood shop sign, located at 214 13th St. in Fort Macleod, open Thursday through Saturday from 12 noon to 6 p.m., phone 368-996-1968, follow us on Facebook at Get Stuff’d.

What the application alleges

The judicial review application raises several concerns about how Elections Alberta carried out its verification.

On the legal standard, it points to sections 4 and 6 of the Citizen Initiative Act, arguing the chief electoral officer demanded more than the legislation sets out and undermined its purpose of encouraging public participation in direct democracy.

On the verification calls, the application says the process required electors to recall precise details from a petition they may have signed months earlier, with limited opportunity to clarify their answers.

It also says the calls did not display “Elections Alberta” in caller ID as previously indicated and questions whether the agency considered the recent electors-list data breach and its possible effect on response rates.

On the statistical side, the application challenges the five per cent margin of error and the sampling method, arguing the process failed to account for uncertainty in small sample sizes, applied the mid-point of a formula rather than its low-point, and replaced non-responding electors too quickly.

Together, the campaign says, those practices rejected too many signatures and accepted too few.

The petition and how it got here

The petition, formally titled No New Coal Mining in the Eastern Slopes of the Rocky Mountains, sought to prohibit new coal exploration and mining in the region, exempting mines already in active production as of Jan. 1, 2026.

The campaign began after Elections Alberta issued a notice of initiative petition Feb. 10. Signature collection ran until June 10, when Lund and supporters delivered 18 bins of petition sheets to Elections Alberta’s Edmonton office in a horse trailer.

Elections Alberta’s response

As of publication, Elections Alberta had not publicly responded to the judicial review application. In an earlier written response to Shootin’ the Breeze on the caller-ID concerns, however, the agency said caller ID displaying “Elections AB” was active during verification, and that testing confirmed it worked as intended.

Some recipients may not have seen the identification, the agency said. Individual telephone companies may not include caller ID in their registries and some recipients may have had spam-blocking or caller ID settings that hid it.

Electors selected for verification received a text message before a verification phone call, if they had provided a phone number, the agency said. If a call went unanswered, staff left a voice mail explaining its purpose, a callback number and the verification questions.

Electors who provided an email instead received a message asking them to verify their petition information.

“No signatures were deemed invalid or failed verification because an elector did not answer a phone call or respond to an email or voice mail,” the agency said.

Citizen Initiative Act, Citizen Initiative Petitions, Coal Mining, Eastern Slopes, Judicial Review, Petition Verification, Referendums, Water Protection

Wooden gavel resting on legal books beside brass scales of justice

Separation petition clears signature threshold, court fight continues

A citizen initiative petition proposing a referendum on Alberta becoming an independent country has been declared successful after Elections Alberta verified enough signatures to satisfy the requirements of the Citizen Initiative Act.

The agency announced Friday that statistical verification estimated 222,597 valid signatures from an initial submission of 286,593 signatures, surpassing the required minimum of 177,732.

Despite the successful verification, the process cannot move forward until the courts decide an appeal stemming from an earlier ruling that quashed the petition.

The petition, titled A Referendum Relating to Alberta Independence, asks whether Alberta “should cease to be a part of Canada to become an independent state.” It was organized by proponent Mitch Sylvestre.

Chief electoral officer Gordon McClure determined the petition met the requirements of Section 6 of the Citizen Initiative Act after Elections Alberta completed its verification and determination process. That review was carried out following a June 29 direction from the Alberta Court of Appeal.

How the numbers were reached

According to Elections Alberta, petition organizers initially submitted 286,593 signatures. After the validation process, 279,337 were found to be valid.

A statistical verification process using a 95 per cent confidence level estimated 222,597 signatures belonged to eligible electors, representing about 7.5 per cent of the province’s registered voters.

Under the Citizen Initiative Act in effect on May 1, constitutional initiative petitions require signatures from at least 10 per cent of the 1,777,315 ballots cast in the 2023 provincial election. That amounted to a threshold of 177,732 signatures.

The agency said the most common reasons for rejecting signatures during the initial review were incomplete addresses and electors failing to complete a required declaration of eligibility.

Some canvassers signed witness declarations before electors had signed the petition. Others listed a mailing address instead of a physical residential address, as the law requires.

Elections Alberta also rejected 292 duplicate signatures. Signing a petition more than once breaches the act, the agency said.

During the verification phase, signatures were most often rejected when information provided by an elector did not match the signature sheet, or when an elector was unable or unwilling to verify their information.

For the statistical sample, Elections Alberta contacted 952 individuals by phone to complete 384 verifications, the minimum sample size required.

The agency said a caller ID system identified calls as coming from Elections Alberta. Electors who did not answer, or did not return a call, voice mail or email, were not counted as having failed verification.

Fraud allegation reviewed

Elections Alberta said it was aware of a social media post alleging that an individual’s signature had been used fraudulently. The agency reviewed the claim against its verification script, process and call records. It said the description in the post did not match its process and records did not support the allegation.

The account holder who made the post did not respond to requests for further information.

Separately, Elections Alberta said it screened the petition for names seeded from the Republican Party of Alberta’s list of electors, a step ordered by the chief electoral officer on May 1 after a data breach in April.

Any seeded name found on a petition would trigger additional scrutiny. The agency confirmed none of the seeded names appeared among the submitted signatures.

A petition tied up in court

The petition’s path has not been straightforward. The application was approved and a notice of initiative petition was issued Jan. 2.

The signature-gathering period ran until May 2 and Sylvestre delivered the signed petition to McClure on May 4, along with an affidavit confirming all copies of the signature sheets had been destroyed, as the law requires.

Before verification could begin, the petition was challenged in court by a group of First Nations, who argued the process was unconstitutional. A judge agreed to pause certification of the petition on April 10, ruling that First Nations had not been properly consulted.

Both Sylvestre and the Alberta government appealed that decision.

A later ruling on May 13 from the Court of King’s Bench went further, quashing the chief electoral officer’s original decision to approve the petition. The signature sheets were sealed, locked in cabinets and kept under 24-hour security while the legal fight continued.

Sylvestre appealed the quashing and on June 29, a Court of Appeal justice granted a partial stay, ordering Elections Alberta to carry out the verification process and report the results publicly.

The stay took effect July 6. It did not require McClure to forward the proposal to the responsible minister, a step normally required once a petition succeeds.

Verification was carried out between July 6 and 23. With that work now complete, Elections Alberta says any further steps in the process remain on hold, pending the outcome of that appeal.

What comes next

Because the underlying legal question is unresolved, Friday’s announcement does not guarantee a referendum will take place. Elections Alberta said next steps will depend on the Court of Appeal’s ruling and any further direction from the courts.

If the process eventually proceeds, the province would move toward a public vote on the question proposed by Sylvestre’s petition: whether Alberta should leave Canada and become an independent state.

Alberta Separation | Independence | Bill 54, Citizen Initiative Act, Citizen Initiative Petitions, First Nations, Referendums

A hand holding a smartphone showing an incoming call screen with "Decline" and "Accept" buttons. Breakfast foods like croissants and cake are visible in the background.

Did Elections Alberta call you? Water Not Coal wants to know

Water Not Coal is asking people contacted by Elections Alberta during petition signature verification to share their experiences, as the campaign weighs a legal challenge with a filing deadline of Aug. 2.

“We’re still gathering our information. We’ve put out a public call,” campaign proponent Corb Lund says. “We want to understand their experience and make sure that their experience matches with what we’re being told by Elections Alberta.”

Water Not Coal submitted 207,435 signatures on June 10, and an initial count validated 196,088 — well above the 177,732 needed to force a referendum on new coal mining in Alberta’s Eastern Slopes.

A second-stage verification, run from June 11 to July 2, dropped the estimate to 172,088, leaving the campaign 5,644 signatures short.

Caller ID use in question

Lund says the campaign is trying to determine whether Elections Alberta used caller ID during its verification calls, and whether it did so consistently.

He says the question matters, given the timing. The province’s voter list was breached in April, exposing the personal information of 2.9 million Albertans.

If people were called without proper identification, in the wake of the privacy breach, they may not have felt comfortable sharing their information, he says.

Some people have told the campaign they did not see Elections Alberta identified on their caller display, Lund says, while acknowledging it is too early to determine whether that was isolated or widespread.

“We’re trying to find out if that was just a couple of anomalies or if it was systemic, and we’re not sure yet, honestly,” he says.

Elections Alberta responds

Elections Alberta says caller ID displaying “Elections AB” was active during the petition verification process and that testing confirmed it worked as intended.

However, the agency says some recipients may not have seen the identification because individual telephone companies may not include caller ID information in their registries or because of recipients’ own spam or caller ID settings.

“Testing indicates most major telephone companies and their discount carriers showed the caller ID and did not report the call as spam,” Elections Alberta says in a written statement to Shootin’ the Breeze.

The agency says electors selected for verification received a text message before a verification phone call if a phone number was provided on the petition. If the call was not answered, staff left a voicemail explaining the purpose of the call, providing a callback number and outlining the verification questions.

If an email address was provided instead, Elections Alberta says, electors received an email asking them to verify the information recorded on the petition.

“No signatures were deemed invalid or failed verification because an elector did not answer a phone call or respond to an email or voicemail,” the agency says.

Judicial review deadline

Water Not Coal has until Aug. 2 to file and serve an application for judicial review of Elections Alberta’s determination, as required under Section 53(2) of the Citizen Initiative Act.

The provision requires an application to be filed within 30 days of the July 2 determination. A judicial review allows the court to examine whether the decision-making process complied with the law and principles of procedural fairness.

Lund says the deadline is adding pressure, but the campaign will not be rushed into a decision.

He says the proposed challenge would not allege corruption or dishonesty by Elections Alberta. Instead, it would challenge whether the agency’s process was reasonable and fair.

Focus stays on petition

Lund says his focus right now is on the petition itself, not broader reform of Alberta’s citizen initiative process.

He says a judicial review, if the campaign proceeds, could still prompt Elections Alberta to make internal changes.

“I don’t think I’m personally going to be going after EA. I don’t have the energy for it,” he says.

Anyone wishing to share their verification experience can find an online form at verify.waternotcoal.ca.

Citizen Initiative Act, Coal Mining, Referendums, Water Not Coal Petition

Blank petition form with tip of fountain pen above signature line

Elections Alberta begins verifying independence petition

Elections Alberta began verifying signatures July 6 on a citizen initiative petition seeking a referendum on Alberta independence, with results due by July 27.

The petition, titled A Referendum Relating to Alberta Independence, proposes the question “Do you agree that the Province of Alberta should cease to be a part of Canada to become an independent state?”

Verification began following a June 29 Court of Appeal decision.

Proponent Mitch Sylvestre submitted the signature sheets May 4, but the process was put on hold — first through a stay issued by the Court of King’s Bench, then a decision that quashed the petition.

Sylvestre appealed and the Court of Appeal issued a partial stay requiring Elections Alberta to proceed with verification and report the results, effective July 6.

To succeed, the petition needs valid signatures from at least 10 per cent of the total votes cast in the 2023 provincial general election or 177,732 signatures. Elections Alberta has 21 days to verify the petition to a 95 per cent confidence level, using a method set out in the Citizen Initiative Act.

Verification includes confirming that only official signature sheets were used, that signatures are original and signed only once, that each carries the required elector information, and that each was witnessed by a registered canvasser.

Elections Alberta will also check a statistically valid random sample of signatories’ addresses and contact a random sample of signatories to confirm their information.

Those who listed a phone number will receive a text message ahead of a verification call; those who listed an email will receive a verification email. Elections Alberta says there is no need to call or text back, and electors who signed should be prepared to verify their information if contacted.

Chief Electoral Officer Gordon McClure notified both the proponent and the minister of justice of the verification dates, times and location. Both may request scrutineers (lawyers and active members of the Law Society) to observe.

It is the second citizen initiative petition Elections Alberta has verified this summer, following the Water Not Coal petition, which fell short of the signature threshold July 3.

Elections Alberta will post the verification results on its website as soon as practical, and no later than July 27. If the petition is successful, Elections Alberta will submit the proposal to the minister of justice, who is required under the Citizen Initiative Act to refer it toward a constitutional referendum.

More information on the citizen initiative process is available at elections.ab.ca.

Alberta Separation | Independence | Bill 54, Citizen Initiative Act, Citizen Initiative Petitions, Provincial Elections, Referendums, Water Not Coal Petition

Corb Lund, man with dark hair wearing a cowboy hat with crowd behind him

Lund weighs legal action after coal petition fails

The Water Not Coal campaign says it submitted more than enough signatures to force a referendum on new coal mining in Alberta’s Eastern Slopes, but Elections Alberta says it missed the mark by 5,644. Now proponent Corb Lund is exploring a court challenge over how the count came up short.

In a statement issued July 6 Lund says he has concerns about the “procedural fairness” of Elections Alberta’s validation and verification process and is consulting lawyers over whether it was applied reasonably.

Of 207,435 signatures submitted, the agency validated 196,088 — comfortably above the 177,732 required under Alberta’s Citizen Initiative Act. But a verification step that involved contacting a sample of signatories by phone and email reduced the estimated number of valid signatures to 172,088, leaving the campaign short.

Lund has concerns about the number of signatures removed during the process.

“In the end, 35,000 of 207,000 signatories were rejected for various reasons. This seems like a ridiculously large number, given the thoroughness and dedication of our canvassers,” he says. “After being briefed by my lawyer/scrutineer that was in the room during the count, I have some real issues with the way this was handled.”

He says Albertans made their opposition to coal development clear and the government should not allow “thousands of Albertans” to be disenfranchised. He and his team have 30 days to file for a judicial review and are weighing their options.

Lund says the provincial government should recognize the 172,088 verified signatures and pause coal development in the Eastern Slopes.

“That’s 10 per cent of actual voters from the last election,” he says. “The overwhelming voices of Albertans opposing development in these areas needs to be respected.”

Water Not Coal director Laura Laing defended the campaign’s canvassers.

“We had 196,088 validated signatures, meaning there was only a five per cent error rate in the signature sheets submitted by our volunteer canvassers. In a complex and detailed process, this reflects exceptional integrity and professional accountability,” she says.

“They are understandably exasperated by the announcement.”

Lund says he is now “up to his eyeballs in meetings with attorneys specializing in administrative law.”

Next steps for Water Not Coal are expected in the days ahead.

Reaction in the region is split

The outcome landed differently among locals, in a region long divided over coal development.

Allan Garbutt, a Cowley resident who supports the petition, is unhappy with the result. He questions whether the verification process was fair to signatories, not the campaign.

“I don’t think there was a lack of signatures,” he says. “I think it’s a difficult verification process.”

“This day and age, who picks up the phone for an unknown caller? A whole lot of email gets directed straight to junk. I suspect that had a lot to do with Elections Alberta not being able to verify some signatures.”

Garbutt trusts Lund and Water Not Coal to navigate the legal process ahead.

Pincher Creek resident Don McRae takes the opposite view. He is “very pleased” with the announcement, saying modern regulations already protect water sources from mining impacts.

“I believe the environmental guidelines today make companies more accountable to ensure water is not harmed,” he says. “I believe the southwest corner of Alberta needs an industry like Grassy Mountain to bring economic development to our area.”

McRae says the province should work with the federal government to keep environmental standards in place while approving development.

“Our younger generation needs some good-paying careers so they stay and raise families in our communities,” he says.

How the count worked

The 177, 732 threshold represents 10 per cent of the voters who cast ballots in Alberta’s 2023 provincial election.

Elections Alberta says signatures were most often removed during validation for errors in elector information, missing information, duplicate entries — 551 in all — and incomplete canvasser declarations.

The verification process, which reduced the total further, involved contacting a random sample of petition signatories by phone and email to confirm their information. This reduced the estimated number of valid signatures to 172,088.

The agency also checked the petition against seeded names as an anti-fraud measure and found none among the submitted signatures.

Background

The petition, formally titled No New Coal Mining in the Eastern Slopes of the Rocky Mountains, sought to prohibit new coal mining and exploration. It would have exempted mines already in active production as of Jan. 1, 2026.

Two projects were named directly. One is Northback Holdings’ Grassy Mountain project near the headwaters of the Oldman River in the Crowsnest Pass. The other is Valory Resources‘ Blackstone project in Clearwater County, near the headwaters of the North Saskatchewan River.

Grassy Mountain has a contentious history. A joint federal-provincial review panel rejected the project in 2021, when it was held by Benga Mining. It later returned to the approval process under Northback Holdings. In May 2025, the Alberta Energy Regulator approved deep-drilling exploration permits for the site.

The petition campaign launched with the issuance of a notice of initiative petition on Feb. 10. Signature collection ran until June 10. Lund and Water Not Coal supporters delivered 18 bins of signature sheets to the Elections Alberta office in Edmonton, unloading them from a horse trailer.

Verification began June 11 and concluded July 2, as required by regulations. It was the first citizen initiative petition verified with scrutineers present, a change introduced through Bill 23, the Justice Statutes Amendment Act, 2026.

Under the act, Lund and other proponents were required to return the petition and canvasser identification documents, destroy copies of signature sheets and file a signed affidavit confirming both steps by July 6.

Financial reports related to the campaign are due to Elections Alberta by Aug. 10.

Bill 23, Citizen Initiative Act, Coal Mining, Coal Policy, No New Coal Mining Petition, Resource Development, Water Security

Blank petition form with tip of fountain pen above signature line

Corb Lund’s coal petition fails by 5,644 signatures

A citizen-led campaign aimed at stopping new coal mining along Alberta’s Eastern Slopes has failed to clear its final hurdle after a provincewide signature review.

Elections Alberta confirmed July 3 that the initiative led by musician Corb Lund and the Water Not Coal group is unsuccessful under the Citizen Initiative Act.

Chief Electoral Officer Gordon McClure said the petition did not meet the required threshold after verification and statistical sampling of signatures collected across the province.

Despite more than 196,000 signatures being counted as valid, the verified total fell below the legal requirement needed to trigger the proposed legislative change.

Under Alberta’s rules, a successful citizen initiative requires support from 10 per cent of voters who cast ballots in the most recent provincial election. That number was set at 177,732 signatures based on the 2023 general election.

Organizers appeared to clear that bar easily. Elections Alberta reported that 196,088 signatures were initially counted as valid.

“There’ll be a few bad addresses, but we only needed 178,000. That’s a really big buffer. So we’re quite confident,” Lund told Shootin’ the Breeze after delivering the signatures to Elections Alberta.

However, after a required statistical sampling process applied at a 95 per cent confidence level, the estimated number of valid signatures dropped to 172,088, leaving the campaign 5,644 signatures short of the threshold.

In a statement issued July 3, Lund said he was “simultaneously shocked by this outcome, yet, unfortunately, not surprised, given the continual government rule changes and roadblocks we have faced throughout this campaign.”

He questioned both the result and the process behind it.

“This has been an unreasonable and opaque process from the beginning and, despite diligently following every rule, we are left with more questions than answers,” he said. “I have grave concerns about how this number was reached and the fairness of the process itself.”

Lund said his campaign delivered more than 205,000 signatures on June 10, of which roughly 35,000 were rejected. Elections Alberta’s count began from 196,088 signatures it initially deemed valid, which random statistical sampling then reduced to an estimated 172,088. The agency did not publish a figure for the total number of sheets delivered.

How the count worked

Provincewide, an estimated 5.8 per cent of Alberta’s roughly 2.96 million registered electors signed the petition, according to Elections Alberta.

The agency said most signatures rejected during the initial validation phase were tied to incomplete elector information, invalid dates, electors signing more than once and incomplete or improperly completed canvasser signature witnessing declarations.

During the verification phase, further signatures were lost. Some electors could not be reached and others were unwilling to confirm their information.

Elections Alberta also confirmed the petition was checked against seeded names drawn from the Republican Party of Alberta’s list of electors, an anti-fraud measure added May 1, 2026. No matches were found.

The petition, formally titled the No New Coal Mining in the Eastern Slopes of the Rocky Mountains initiative, sought to prohibit new coal mining and exploration. It would have exempted mines already in active production as of Jan. 1, 2026.

Two projects were named directly. One is Northback Holdings’ Grassy Mountain project near the headwaters of the Oldman River in the Crowsnest Pass. The other is Valory Resources’ Blackstone project in Clearwater County, near the North Saskatchewan River’s headwaters.

Grassy Mountain has a contentious history. A joint federal-provincial review panel rejected the project in 2021, when it was held by Benga Mining. It later returned to the approval process under Northback Holdings. In May 2025, the Alberta Energy Regulator approved deep-drilling exploration permits for the site.

The petition campaign launched with the Notice of Initiative Petition on Feb. 10. Signature collection ran until June 10. Lund and Water Not Coal supporters delivered 18 bins of signature sheets to the Elections Alberta office in Edmonton, unloading them from a horse trailer.

Verification began June 11 and concluded July 2, as required under the Act. It was the first citizen initiative petition verified with scrutineers present, a change introduced through Bill 23, the Justice Statutes Amendment Act, 2026.

The process now moves to its final steps.

Under the Act, Lund and other proponents have until July 6 to return the petition and all canvasser identification documents to Elections Alberta, destroy any copies of signature sheets and file a signed affidavit confirming both steps were completed.

Financial reports related to the campaign are due to Elections Alberta by Aug. 10.

“Today’s announcement is merely another step in the overall fight to protect the Eastern Slopes, not the end of it,” Lund said. He will outline Water Not Coal’s next steps on Monday, July 6.

Bill 23, Citizen Initiative Act, Coal Mining, Coal Policy, No New Coal Mining Petition, Resource Development, Signature Verification, Water Security

Jim Green, a Pincher Creek supporter of Water Not Coal, stands with Corb Lund.

Coal petition delivered, premier says no October ballot

Corb Lund’s campaign to halt new coal mining along Alberta’s Eastern Slopes has cleared its threshold, but Premier Danielle Smith says the question won’t appear on the Oct. 19 referendum ballot, despite earlier indications it would.

On June 10, Lund and a group of Water Not Coal supporters unloaded 18 bins of signature sheets from a horse trailer outside the Elections Alberta office in Edmonton. Lund says organizers used the trailer to make a point about who this fight belongs to.

“We got over 205,000,” Lund told Shootin’ the Breeze. “There’ll be a few bad addresses, but we only needed 178,000. That’s a really big buffer. So we’re quite confident.”

Organizers say the four-month signature drive drew support from across the province — from urban centres to rural communities, First Nations and remote areas near the Eastern Slopes.

“It shows that Albertans are very strongly against these coal mines at the headwaters of our rivers,” Lund says. “We got signatures from 84 out of 87 ridings in the province. It was a very wide group of Albertans voicing their opinion.”

For Water Not Coal spokesperson Laura Laing, a rancher and longtime advocate for protecting the Eastern Slopes, the delivery was a milestone.

“It was very heartwarming,” she says. “We kind of wrapped all those months of blood, sweat and tears. It was quite the moment in history, really. One of the biggest moments that I think our province has seen on a grassroots initiative.”

Smith says deadline had already passed

On her June 13 Your Province, Your Premier radio show, Smith said the proposal is a legislative initiative that must be reviewed by a committee before recommendations are made to government.

During an unrelated press conference four days later, Smith told reporters the coal question will not appear on the Oct. 19 ballot. She said Elections Alberta set a June 1 deadline for the final list of referendum questions and the Water Not Coal verification process could not be completed in time.

Elections Alberta later confirmed to media that the deadline was set to ensure technological readiness, staffing and materials in advance of the referendum, saying each additional question requires 4.9 million ballot sheets.

Smith said the petition will instead be referred to a legislative committee, which will not be assembled until the legislature reconvenes Oct. 27.

“They’ll decide what direction to take with it,” she said. “It could result in a recommendation for a provincewide vote, which would take place in October of 2027.”

Smith also pointed to complications the committee would need to consider: provincial legislation requiring compensation when private property rights are restricted and the 2024 Crowsnest Pass plebiscite.

The premier’s announcement marks a shift from her earlier public position. As recently as April, she told reporters she expected the deadline for adding referendum questions to align with the close of the Water Not Coal signature-collection period.

Justice Minister Mickey Amery‘s office said the government plans “to see this process play out” and wait for the final verified signature count.

Lund disputes the deadline

Lund criticized the decision, saying organizers were not informed of the deadline despite discussions with the premier while the petition campaign was underway.

“To be told that the petition won’t make the ballot because it allegedly missed a June 1 deadline is unacceptable,” Lund said in a statement following the premier’s comments.

“I personally met with the premier in her office on May 11. We were literally discussing the wording of my question as it should appear on the ballot, face-to-face. And at no point was any June 1 deadline mentioned.”

Smith repeatedly said publicly that if Water Not Coal collected enough signatures, the question would appear on the fall ballot, Lund said.

“My team, all the canvassers and Albertans in general deserve consistency, honesty and fair treatment around these petition and direct-democracy issues that the premier has professed to believe in so strongly, so many times.”

He also argued the government has the authority to add questions to the ballot if it chooses.

“If the premier wants to put something on the ballot, she easily can,” he said. “She has done so multiple times — first with her original nine referendum questions, and then with the current question on separatism. The authority and the choice are available to her. And Albertans deserve to know why that authority was not used in this case, despite more than 200,000 people calling for it.”

Lund also pointed to evidence beyond the petition itself.

“Independent findings from the coal policy review initiated by the former UCP government in 2021 showed more than 80 per cent of Albertans oppose new coal mining on the Eastern Slopes,” he said.

“Those facts, and the overwhelming public support reflected in more than 200,000 signatures, cannot be dismissed by a procedural excuse or an arbitrary deadline that was never communicated.”

On the Crowsnest Pass plebiscite Smith cited, Lund said the comparison was misleading.

“A turnout of roughly 1,700 people in a heavily lobbied local referendum in the Crowsnest Pass that voted in favour of the Grassy Mountain mining project (which is not even in the Crowsnest Pass municipality) does not represent the will of Albertans,” he said.

“More people canvassed for this petition than were even permitted to vote in the Crowsnest Pass plebiscite that the coal companies like to refer to so frequently. The scale of public concern is provincewide, and it cannot be minimized.”

What the petition asks

The petition calls on the provincial government to prohibit new coal mining and exploration anywhere along Alberta’s Eastern Slopes, exempting only mines already in active production as of Jan. 1, 2026.

It specifically names Northback Holdings‘ Grassy Mountain project near the headwaters of the Oldman River in the Crowsnest Pass area and Valory Resources’ Blackstone project in Clearwater County, near the headwaters of the North Saskatchewan River.

The Grassy Mountain proposal was rejected in 2021 by a joint federal-provincial review panel. Held at the time by Benga Mining, the project re-entered the approval process under Northback Holdings, and in May 2025 the Alberta Energy Regulator approved deep-drilling exploration permits.

Industry responds

Northback Holdings and Valory Resources both responded to the petition delivery with statements to CBC News on June 10. The Coal Association of Canada has also been a vocal industry voice during the campaign.

Northback’s strategic communications manager, James Robson, said there is strong support for the Grassy Mountain project “as demonstrated by provincewide external polling which determined that up to 74 per cent of Albertans support it.”

“Further, the 2024 referendum in Crowsnest Pass saw 72 per cent support for the Grassy Mountain project,” Robson wrote.

“If approved, the Grassy Mountain project will produce high-quality steelmaking coal for global markets, provide hundreds of millions of dollars in economic benefits and hundreds of direct jobs, while adhering to the highest environmental standards.”

Ian Black, CEO of Valory Resources, said in a written statement that his company is committed to developing its underground metallurgical coal mine responsibly.

“It is disappointing to see misinformation about this industry, especially in Alberta,” Black said.

Rina Blacklaws, vice-president of industry development for the Coal Association of Canada, told the Western Standard in early June that the petition would put project decisions in “the court of public opinion as opposed to the technical expert review panel at the Alberta Energy Regulator.”

“That can put our province at a disadvantage in attracting private sector investment and realizing the economic and community benefits that come with critical mineral development,” Blacklaws said.

Where things stand

Elections Alberta has until July 2 to complete signature verification.

Lund closed his statement with thanks to the campaign’s supporters:

“I want to thank every Albertan who signed, every volunteer who canvassed, and every community group that stood up to protect our water, mountains and ranchland. Your work matters. We will continue to organize, to demand accountability, transparency and to insist that promises made to the public are kept.”

Citizen-Led Petitions, Coal Mining, Coal Policy, Direct Democracy, Environmental Protection, Public Accountability, Referendums, Water Security

Corb Lund, man with dark hair wearing a cowboy hat with crowd behind him

Water Not Coal petition clears signature threshold

Corb Lund’s campaign to halt new coal mining along Alberta’s Eastern Slopes has cleared its threshold. Organizers delivered more than 205,000 signatures to Elections Alberta on June 10, about 27,000 more than the 177,732 signatures required under the Citizen Initiative Act.

Lund and a group of Water Not Coal supporters arrived at the Elections Alberta office in Edmonton with a horse trailer in tow. Eighteen bins of signature sheets were unloaded, marking what they describe as a defining moment in a six-year fight over coal policy in the province.

While Lund says there is a significant buffer between signatures required and collected, Elections Alberta must verify the signatures before the initiative can proceed further.

“We got over 205,000,” Lund says. “There’ll be a few bad addresses, but we only needed 178,000. That’s a really big buffer. So we’re quite confident.”

Organizers say the four-month signature drive drew support from across the province — from urban centres to rural communities, First Nations and remote areas near the Eastern Slopes.

“It shows that Albertans are very strongly against these coal mines at the headwaters of our rivers,” Lund says. “We got signatures from 84 out of 87 ridings in the province. It was a very wide group of Albertans voicing their opinion.”

For Water Not Coal organizers, the delivery marked both a logistical endpoint and an emotional milestone. Spokesperson Laura Laing, a rancher and longtime advocate for protecting the Eastern Slopes, calls the delivery a surreal and emotional moment.

“It was very heartwarming,” she says. “We kind of wrapped all those months of blood, sweat and tears. It was quite the moment in history, really. One of the biggest moments that I think our province has seen on a grassroots initiative.”

The horse trailer was a deliberate transportation choice. Lund says organizers brought it to make a point about who this fight belongs to.

“It was just to show people that rural people care about this,” he says.

Elections Alberta officials accepted the 18 bins, issued an affidavit of receipt and began verification the next morning. The agency, which operates independently of any political party, has 21 days to count and validate the signatures.

Clearing the threshold does not automatically put a coal question on a referendum ballot.

Under the Citizen Initiative Act, a verified legislative proposal goes to the Speaker of the legislative assembly and the government must refer it to a committee that can recommend either legislation or a provincewide vote.

Alberta already has a referendum with 10 separate questions set for Oct. 19; organizers hope a coal question can join it.

However, Premier Danielle Smith has indicated the coal proposal must first proceed through the process outlined in the Citizen Initiative Act before any decision is made on whether it will appear on a ballot.

Speaking on a radio show, Smith said the petition is a legislative proposal that must be reviewed by a committee, which will consult with government officials and make recommendations on how to proceed.

“I looked at the petition and it calls for a legislative proposal, so I have to figure out what that means,” Smith said. “There is a process that’s outlined in the act, and we will follow that process on this one too.”

What the petition asks

The petition calls on the provincial government to prohibit new coal mining and exploration anywhere along Alberta’s Eastern Slopes, exempting only mines already in active production as of Jan. 1, 2026.

It specifically names two proposed developments — Northback Holdings’ Grassy Mountain project near the headwaters of the Oldman River in the Crowsnest Pass area and Valory Resources’ Blackstone project in Clearwater County, near the headwaters of the North Saskatchewan River.

Lund has said both projects are at similar stages in the regulatory process and represent the most immediate potential coal developments on the Eastern Slopes, but has emphasized the petition is deliberately broader.

“We specifically included Grassy Mountain and Blackstone within the wording of the question, because we wanted to be very clear that it includes those two,” Lund has said.

Six years in the making

The campaign’s roots stretch back to 2020, when Alberta’s move to lift long-standing protections on Rocky Mountain coal mining sparked widespread opposition.

The Grassy Mountain proposal was rejected in 2021 by a joint federal-provincial review panel, when the project was held by Benga Mining.

It re-entered the approval process with a modified approach under Northback Holdings rebranding and, in May 2025, the Alberta Energy Regulator approved deep-drilling exploration permits for the site.

Lund’s personal involvement includes meetings with coal lobbyists and company executives, correspondence with government ministers, participation in protests and presentations at regulatory hearings.

The idea for a citizen initiative took shape following a June 2025 town hall in Fort Macleod where Premier Smith encouraged those concerned about coal mining to consider that route. Lund and Water Not Coal organizers filed a notice of intent and received approval, but not without a significant setback.

Legislative interruption

In December 2025, the campaign was thrown into uncertainty when Elections Alberta informed organizers their previously approved petition had been retroactively cancelled following the implementation of Bill 14, provincial legislation that amended Alberta’s citizen initiative framework.

The bill transferred certain decision-making powers from the chief electoral officer to the justice minister and nullified petitions that had not been formally issued before the legislation took effect.

In a Dec. 12 statement, Lund said the cancellation was a serious blow but that organizers used the interruption to sharpen their operations. A new notice of intent was filed Dec. 19 and Elections Alberta confirmed on Jan. 27 that the revised application met legislative requirements.

The formal petition was issued Feb. 10, with the signature collection window running from Feb. 11 to June 10.

Four months on the road

Over the four-month collection period, Water Not Coal mobilized more than 3,000 registered canvassers across the province, staging thousands of signing events at community centres, markets, breweries, ranches, doorsteps and sidewalks.

In the final stretch, Lund conducted what organizers called a last-chance tour running from Lethbridge to Edmonton.

“There were people lined up to sign and say thanks,” Laing says, adding that even people from Crowsnest Pass and the MD of Ranchland supported the petition.

She says the broader human experience of the campaign left its own lasting impression.

“The friendships made along the way are incredible, and just connections to people we wouldn’t have met before,” Laing says. “I think the human experience of this whole thing has been the biggest adventure experience and return on our efforts for sure.”

Support for the campaign was also visible in the Pincher Creek area, which sits close to the proposed Grassy Mountain project. Lund says he received a “very positive” response during a visit to the community earlier in the campaign, noting it was his first time engaging directly with residents there on the coal issue.

A dispute over water

In the final weeks of the campaign, organizers seized on a Northback move they say validates their concerns — a water licence application Northback Holdings filed with the Alberta Energy Regulator. Organizers argue it contradicts the company’s years of assurances that Grassy Mountain would not need additional water from the already stressed Oldman River system.

“They promised for a number of years that they wouldn’t need any of our water, and they’ve just turned around and made an application for a large amount of water,” Lund says. “To me, that’s basically lying.”

Laing, whose ranch operations in southern Alberta have already been affected by drought and tightening water allocations, was equally pointed.

“They say one thing and do another once they’re in,” she says. “As a rancher in the south, I don’t know where this water is going to come from. On our ranch, we’ve had to divest our herd size to accommodate the lack of water. That water needs to be preserved. It’s our No. 1 resource in the province and we can’t be just giving that away.”

At a May 26 presentation to the MD of Pincher Creek council, Northback CEO Mike Young said the company revised its water approach to remove any direct withdrawal from creeks or streams. Instead, operational needs will be met with precipitation captured on-site and water recovered through mine dewatering, stored in dams during rain and seasonal freshet flows.

Young likened the model to storage systems used in Alberta’s irrigation networks and said a water allocation licence is required because the water would be stored and used.

Next steps and objectives

With the petition now in the hands of Elections Alberta, organizers say the next critical step will be determining wording for a potential referendum question. Lund is emphatic that the exact petition wording approved by Elections Alberta be used verbatim.

“We put a lot of time into the wording of our question with lawyers and a lot of thought,” he says. “We insist that the government use our exact wording, because we made it very specific to include the Blackstone project and the Grassy Mountain project.”

Looking beyond a vote, Lund describes a two-part vision of success — strong legislation banning new coal mining on the Eastern Slopes and a level of public awareness durable enough to outlast any future government.

“You could change legislation — even if they make good legislation, some other government can change it down the road,” he says.

“Our goal, in part, with the petition and referendum, is to get enough public discussion on this issue that most Albertans understand how bad an idea this is. If another politician comes along who’s fine with coal at the headwaters of our rivers, they’ll be run out of office.”

For now, organizers say they plan a brief rest before what they expect will be an intense lead-up to a possible fall vote and acknowledge the opposition won’t be quiet.

“The coal industry has become more and more aggressive in their attacks on us,” Lund says. “But they say if you’re getting flak, you’re over the target. They’re feeling the public pressure, definitely.”

 

Alberta Referendum, Citizen Initiative Act, Coal Mining, Eastern Slopes, Resource Development, Water Security

A fountain pen writes the word “Petition” in bold, black ink on white paper.

Water concerns drive support for Corb Lund coal petition

With a June 10 deadline approaching, Pincher Creek volunteers continue gathering signatures for a citizen-led petition that would ban new coal mining along Alberta’s Eastern Slopes. Water security is the issue bringing most residents to the table.

The provincewide campaign was launched by country musician Corb Lund. The petition seeks to prohibit new mining on the Eastern Slopes, excluding mines already operating as of Jan. 1, 2026.

To proceed, organizers must collect 177,732 valid signatures by June 10. Elections Alberta began the official signature collection period on Feb. 11 after the campaign was reapproved earlier this year under updated provincial legislation.

Pincher Creek resident Allan Garbutt, one of the local canvassers, says volunteers have hosted signings at Ranchland Mall and most recently at the Annex in early May, with plans to return.

He says the response from residents has been encouraging, though a paperwork snag has slowed things down.

Elections Alberta requires signatories to provide identification showing a physical address, not a post office box, which means a driver’s licence listing a box number is not accepted.

Garbutt says many rural residents don’t carry a utility bill or tax notice, the kinds of documents that satisfy the requirement.

Water at the centre

Garbutt says the petition taps into anxiety that has been building in southwestern Alberta for years. He points to the region’s visibly low reservoir levels over the past three years as evidence of how precarious the situation already is.

“The water we drink comes off the East Slopes,” he says. “If the coal mines are allowed to proceed, the water either may not be there or it may be contaminated.”

He describes southwestern Alberta as “the driest corner in the driest province,” noting that more than 90 per cent of water flowing into the North and South Saskatchewan River basins originates on the Eastern Slopes.

The problem, he says, is that the foothills and mountain terrain in this part of the province are exceptionally narrow, roughly 20 kilometres wide, compared with as much as 200 kilometres farther north near Edmonton.

“Anybody who’s looked at our reservoir the past three years up until this fall knows how precarious our water situation can be,” he says.

Cody Johnson, the Pincher Creek resident who organized the Annex signing event, says selenium contamination from coal mining is what concerns him most and points to communities near mines in British Columbia’s Elk Valley as a warning.

“They will use clean water and they will produce contaminated water,” Johnson says of the proposed mining projects. “They have not yet demonstrated a way that they can clean and clear the water before they return it to the system.”

He notes that the proposed Grassy Mountain coal project, the focus of much of the opposition, was reviewed by a joint federal-provincial panel, which concluded it would have adverse environmental effects and was not in the public interest. That decision was later upheld through multiple appeals.

The Annex event drew fewer visitors than Johnson hoped, but the mall event weeks earlier was more successful. One group of visitors stayed with him.

“Several people used to work in mines in British Columbia and they said, ‘We don’t want it here,’ because they say, ‘We know what happens,’” he says. “I was surprised when miners came up to me and said that.”

He frames coal as a sunset industry ill-suited to the region’s future and questions the economic rationale for a project that would, in his view, put tourism, fishing and recreation at risk for a limited number of short-term jobs.

“You aren’t bringing tourists to look at open-pit mines and blowing up mountains,” he says. “That one industry would put many other things at risk.”

A narrow strip, and a fragile one

Brenda Davison, an environmentalist who lives near Burmis, between Crowsnest Pass and Pincher Creek, says her concerns are both personal and environmental.

She draws her drinking water from a private well fed by groundwater near the Crowsnest River and says contamination from selenium — a byproduct of coal mining that leaches into waterways — would leave her with no safe alternative.

“If the groundwater gets contaminated, I’m in big trouble,” she says. “They can clean the surface water, but they can’t get that deep water.”

She describes the area’s mountains as uniquely fragile water towers. Unlike areas near Canmore or Banff, where multiple mountain ranges provide a broad band of water-capturing terrain, she says the Crowsnest area has only a thin strip between the Continental Divide and the open prairie.

“The reason the Crowsnest River keeps running even when it’s not raining is because the mountains are like big water towers,” she says. “They hold the water.”

Davison also worries about coal dust and the long-term impact of open-pit mining on wildlife habitat and migration corridors along the Eastern Slopes. Grizzly bears, elk and wolves once ranged across the prairies, but she says they have been pushed back by private land development until only a narrow corridor of public land remains.

She describes the Crowsnest area as the narrowest wildlife corridor along the entire Continental Divide and says open-pit mining would further fragment or eliminate it.

Grizzly bears are “an indicator species — if you have bears, you have a healthy ecosystem,” she says. “The only place where there can be grizzly bears or wolves or animals or those kinds of things, where they’re safe, is public land. It’s already very small here.”

She has collected about 50 petition signatures by going door-to-door in the Burmis area, with roughly 70 per cent of those she approached agreeing to sign.

Davison says she understands some residents support coal development because of potential employment opportunities, but believes the economic benefits would be temporary compared with the long-term environmental impact.

“A lot of people in the Crowsnest Pass, their parents and grandparents were coal miners,” she says. “I don’t want to discount other people in the Pass who believe the coal mine will bring jobs, I just believe that a healthy environment is very important.”

Garbutt says organizers plan to continue hosting signing events in Pincher Creek in the coming weeks and encourages residents interested in signing to contact local canvassers.

“Sign the petition — our water security depends on it,” he says. “If somebody up this way wants to sign and they haven’t done it already, I’ll come to their house.”

Citizen-Led Petitions, Coal Mining, Environmental Protection, Open-pit mining, Selenium, Water Security, Wildlife Corridors

Wooden gavel resting on legal books beside brass scales of justice

‘Historic victory’ for Piikani as court quashes separatist petition

Piikani Nation is calling a recent Alberta Court of King’s Bench decision a “historic victory” for treaty rights. A May 13 ruling by Justice Shaina Leonard struck down the approval of a citizen-led petition that would have triggered a referendum on Alberta separating from Canada.

Chief Troy Knowlton says the decision affirms that Treaty 7 is a “living, constitutionally protected agreement” that cannot be overridden by a citizen-led initiative or provincial referendum.

Leonard’s decision quashed chief electoral officer Gordon McClure’s approval of the Referendum Relating to Alberta Independence petition, finding he made an error in law that rendered the approval unreasonable.

The court also found the province failed in its duty to consult First Nations, including the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation, Blood Tribe, Piikani Nation and Siksika Nation, before allowing the process to advance.

In her ruling, Leonard says approval of the petition triggered a legally binding chain of events under Alberta’s Citizen Initiative Act, including a mandatory referendum if enough signatures were verified.

The court found Elections Alberta failed to properly consider earlier judicial findings that a secession proposal would violate treaty rights protected under the Constitution.

The legal backdrop

Leonard’s ruling builds on a Dec. 6, 2025 decision by Justice Colin Feasby, who found a referendum proposal seeking Alberta’s separation would violate treaty rights.

Days later, on Dec. 11, the provincial government amended the Citizen Initiative Act to remove a requirement that referendum proposals be compatible with Charter and treaty rights. A transitional provision applied the change to the existing petition, allowing it to move forward.

Leonard’s ruling casts doubt over the future of the petition.

Stay Free Alberta, the campaign led by Mitch Sylvestre, CEO of the Alberta Prosperity Project, says it had gathered more than 300,000 signatures — well above the roughly 178,000 required to trigger referendum consideration under Alberta’s citizen initiative rules.

The signatures have not been counted. Stay Free Alberta delivered the petition to Elections Alberta on May 4, but the agency was barred from verifying signatures by an interim court injunction issued in April. The boxes remain locked in a secure Elections Alberta facility.

Piikani Nation: Treaty not ‘historical footnote’

For Knowlton, who also serves as president of the Blackfoot Confederacy, Leonard’s ruling validates a position First Nations have maintained from the beginning.

“Treaty 7 is not a historical footnote — it is a living, constitutionally protected agreement that established a nation-to-nation relationship and guaranteed our rights to our lands, our way of life, and our self-determination,” Knowlton says.

“The court has confirmed that those rights cannot be ignored, overridden, or placed at risk by a citizen initiative or provincial referendum.”

He says the ruling makes clear that any attempt to sever Alberta from Canada without proper consultation and accommodation of First Nations rights is “unlawful and unconstitutional.”

He says Piikani Nation “remains committed to protecting our treaty rights through every lawful means available.”

Smith calls ruling ‘anti-democratic,’ vows appeal

The Alberta government says it will appeal the decision.

Premier Danielle Smith, responding to questions at an unrelated press conference on May 13, called the ruling “incorrect in law and anti-democratic,” saying it would deny “well over 300,000 Albertans” the opportunity to have their petition verified.

She says cabinet and caucus will meet to review next steps.

Smith also suggests the ruling raises broader questions about independence movements in Canada and said Alberta would likely seek to continue the legal argument at a higher court.

She maintains the citizen initiative process was designed to be permissive and says the government remains committed to hearing from Albertans.

May 16 appeal

Stay Free Alberta filed its own appeal on May 16. Sylvestre’s lawyer, Jeffrey Rath, says the group will request that the appeal be fast-tracked.

The court filing lists more than a dozen grounds for appeal, including arguments that Leonard erred in finding McClure’s approval unreasonable and in finding that the Crown had a duty to consult in this case.

Opposition tells Smith to accept court decision

Opposition NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi welcomes the decision. Calling out Smith directly, he says the ruling exposed her government’s failure to uphold its legal obligations and urges the premier to “accept the court’s decision.”

Nenshi praises the First Nations who led the legal fight, calling them fearless and saying they acted not just for their own communities but for all Albertans and all Canadians.

He says the referendum proposal is “dead” and calls on the premier to abandon any further effort to revive it, warning that pursuing it would be costly and divisive.

“Albertans are proud Canadians and want nothing more than to move on from this and focus on the things that really matter,” Nenshi says.

The petition at the centre of the case asked Albertans: “Do you agree that the Province of Alberta should cease to be a part of Canada to become an independent state?”

It was approved in January, before being challenged in court by First Nations groups over constitutional and treaty concerns.

Alberta Separation | Independence | Bill 54, Citizen Initiative Act, Citizen-Led Petitions, Constitutional Law, Duty To Consult, First Nations, Treaty 7, Treaty Rights

A red padlock icon appears over a blue digital security background with the words “Security Breach,” illustrating the Alberta voter list data breach.

Personal data of 2.9 million Albertans exposed in voter list breach

The personal information of 2.9 million Albertans — including names, addresses and in some cases phone numbers — was published publicly on a website by the Centurion Project Ltd., a third-party organization that obtained Alberta’s list of electors without authorization.

Elections Alberta confirmed the breach on April 30 and obtained an emergency court injunction the same day barring the Centurion Project from accessing or using the data.

Alberta RCMP have since launched an investigation and are working with other law enforcement partners to determine whether any offences were committed in the dissemination or handling of the voter list. RCMP have confirmed the investigation was triggered in part by correspondence from an individual associated with the Alberta NDP who raised concerns about potential misuse of the list.

“More than 2.9 million Albertans have had their personal information breached,” said Information and Privacy Commissioner Diane McLeod. “For some of these individuals there is likely a real risk of significant harm given that their home address and phone numbers have been made public. This could be especially harmful for certain individuals. Some examples might be those who work for law enforcement, who are public officials, who are fleeing intimate partner violence and other vulnerable individuals.”

About the Centurion Project

The Centurion Project website currently shows no information.

According to CBC News, the Centurion Project describes itself as “a company that was established to help train volunteers on how to be better citizens and to impact the political process,” adding that its app “is strictly used by volunteers to find people they personally know in a database.”

The group says volunteers “are not given access to any phone numbers or emails and are encouraged only to contact and claim people they already know.”

The Centurion Project said it relied on a third party to provide the dataset used in its tool. It has since shut down the app and says it intends to fully comply with Elections Alberta’s investigation.

How it happened

The list of electors was originally provided to the Republican Party of Alberta as a registered political party legally entitled to receive it. Elections Alberta says the data was then accessed by the Centurion Project — a third party with no legal right to the list — and published on its website.

Elections Alberta obtained credible information about the breach on April 27 and Chief Electoral Officer Gordon McClure issued a cease-and-desist order to the Centurion Project on April 28. When that directive went unheeded, Elections Alberta representatives attended a Centurion Project meeting in Edmonton on April 29, supported by Edmonton Police Service officers, to personally serve the order.

On the morning of April 30, Elections Alberta and legal counsel obtained an emergency injunction from the Court of King’s Bench. The order requires the Centurion Project Ltd. and the Republican Party of Alberta to identify everyone who received or accessed the list and provide that information to the chief electoral officer within four days.

Political response

The United Conservative Caucus acknowledged that caucus staff attended a Centurion Project meeting on April 16, more than 10 days before Elections Alberta says it obtained credible information about the breach.

“Caucus staff regularly attend events of political interest, including the meeting in question,” said Shanna Schulhauser, director of communications for the United Conservative Caucus.

“The organizers of this meeting were adamant that the data being used was obtained legally. At the same time, the staff observing the meeting had no reason to believe the website in question was unlawful.”

The caucus statement also directed criticism at the Alberta NDP, alleging that members of the Opposition, including the leader of the Opposition, may have suspected the list was illegal but did not bring that information forward to the government for several weeks.

“Perhaps instead of pointing fingers and playing politics the NDP should let these independent bodies [do] their job and investigate,” Schulhauser said.

Why Elections Alberta didn’t act sooner

McClure addressed public frustration about the timeline directly, pointing to legislation passed last year that significantly raised the bar for launching investigations.

Under Bill 54, passed by the legislature in 2025, Elections Alberta must now have “reasonable grounds to believe an offence has occurred” before it can begin investigating — a standard the chief electoral officer had warned against.

In a letter to all MLAs in May 2025, McClure cautioned that the higher threshold would mean “the onus will fall on a complainant to provide a substantively completed investigation in order for the election commissioner to look into a matter,” and that the changes would “eliminate the majority of the compliance activities undertaken by the election commissioner.”

“Elections Alberta can confirm that requiring ‘reasonable grounds’ in legislation has indeed impacted Albertans in this and other matters, as predicted in that letter,” McClure said.

A gap in Alberta’s privacy law

Commissioner McLeod flagged a significant legal gap exposed by the breach: Alberta’s Personal Information Protection Act does not apply to political parties, meaning the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner may have limited jurisdiction over how the Republican Party of Alberta handled the list.

“This is evidence of a concerning gap in Alberta’s privacy laws as it relates to the collection, use and disclosure of personal information by political parties,” McLeod said, noting her office has been calling for political parties to be made subject to PIPA for decades.

British Columbia’s substantially similar privacy legislation does apply to that province’s political parties. McLeod is again calling on the Alberta government to close the gap in the next round of amendments.

Impact on citizen initiative petitions

The breach has direct implications for ongoing citizen initiative petitions in Alberta.

As a security measure, each copy of the voter list provided by Elections Alberta is seeded with fake names before distribution. This allowed Elections Alberta to trace which copy of the list was leaked and to confirm the compromised copy came from the Republican Party of Alberta.

The agency has amended its verification process for all incoming petitions to check whether any seeded names from the compromised Republican Party of Alberta list appear on petition signature sheets.

Petitions affected include the Alberta independence referendum petition, the No New Coal Mining in the Eastern Slopes of the Rocky Mountains petition and two current recall petitions. The updated process will also apply to all future petitions.

Legislation governing citizen initiative petitions is separate from the voter list breach itself. Under current rules, Elections Alberta cannot confirm whether a specific individual’s name appears on a petition signature sheet or remove a name at that person’s request, even if the signature might have been added using compromised data.

What to watch for

Elections Alberta says Albertans should watch for warning signs of identity theft or misuse of personal data. These include unexpected mail or statements, missing bills or financial statements, unfamiliar accounts on credit reports, debt collection calls for unknown accounts and unsolicited emails or texts claiming to help recover personal information.

Legitimate organizations will never ask for sensitive personal information via email or text. Do not click links in unsolicited messages — go directly to the official website of the organization in question.

Setting up monitoring through your web browser, antivirus software and financial institution can help detect unusual activity early.

Anyone who believes their information has been misused or that they are a victim of identity theft should report it to local police immediately. Additional guidance is available through the Federal Privacy Commissioner and the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Alberta.

Citizen Initiative Petitions, Data Security, Election Law, Identity Theft, Personal Information, Political Parties, Privacy Breach, Privacy Law, Voter List Breach

Image of a man wearing a red plaid shirt and black cowboy hat.

No new coal mining: Corb Lund drives provincewide petition

Country music artist Corb Lund is preparing to launch a provincewide signature campaign aimed at halting new coal mining along Alberta’s eastern Rocky Mountain slopes.

Following months of regulatory setbacks that temporarily cancelled Lund’s citizen initiative petition, Elections Alberta issued the petition this week.

He says organizers are now preparing canvassers and public signing events as the signature collection period can start from Feb. 11.

Petition targets new coal mining on Eastern Slopes

Lund’s citizen initiative calls on the provincial government to prohibit new coal mining activity anywhere along the Eastern Slopes of the Rockies, excluding mines already in production as of Jan. 1.

Lund says the campaign centres on protecting Alberta’s water systems.

“It’s important to me because I think the coal mines that they’re proposing are going to have a really bad effect on our water sources,” he tells Shootin’ the Breeze.

“There’s other issues too, like the mountains themselves will be affected, as well as the air quality. But the biggest issue is the quantity and quality of water.”

The approved proposal specifically names Northback Holdings’ Grassy Mountain project near the headwaters of the Oldman River and Valory Resources’ Blackstone project in Clearwater County.

Explaining why the two proposed coal mines are referenced, Lund says, “The Grassy Mountain mine they want to put at the headwaters of the Oldman River near Crowsnest Pass is going to have a very serious effect on that river. It’s a terrible place to put a coal mine.”

The Blackstone project was included because of its proximity to another major watershed. It is located in the headwaters of the North Saskatchewan River, a key source of Edmonton’s drinking water.

He notes that both projects are at similar stages in the regulatory process and represent the most immediate potential coal developments on the Eastern Slopes.

But he also emphasizes the petition is broader than those two projects.

“The petition question asked the government to prohibit any coal mining anywhere in the Eastern Slopes of the Rockies that isn’t an actively producing mine as of January 1, 2026. We specifically included Grassy Mountain and Blackstone [projects] within the wording of the question, because we wanted to be very clear that it includes those two,” Lund says.

Stepping into the coal debate

Lund decided to pursue a citizen initiative petition following years of advocacy efforts opposing proposed coal developments along the Eastern Slopes, particularly the Grassy Mountain project.

He says organizers and community members have been raising concerns since 2020, when the Grassy Mountain proposal was rejected by federal and provincial regulators before later re-entering the approval process.

“We have tried everything we can think of and we’re still fighting the same coal mine we were fighting six years ago,” he says. “Having this petition and the citizens’ initiative was the next step, and the only thing we can think of left to do.”

According to Lund, ranchers whose land and water sources could be affected by mining were among the first to approach him about raising public awareness.

“They said they had been attempting to get the government’s attention and the public’s attention on the issue, and they weren’t having any success,” he says.

Before publicly advocating, Lund spent weeks researching the issue, meeting with industry representatives, government officials, conservation groups and agricultural producers.

“I educated myself on the issue,” he says. “And I came to the conclusion that ecologically, environmentally and economically, it’s a terrible idea to have coal mines in those areas.”

Lund adds that his involvement has included meetings with coal lobbyists and company executives, correspondence with government ministers, participation in protests and presentations at regulatory hearings.

He says the idea to use a citizen initiative gained momentum after a town hall meeting in June 2025, where Premier Danielle Smith encouraged residents concerned about coal mining to consider that route.

“She said, if you guys are concerned about coal, you should start a citizens initiative petition,” Lund says. “So that’s what we’re doing.”

He emphasizes his involvement is not tied to party politics.

“This has no partisan implications for me. It has nothing to do with one party or the other,” he says. “It’s just about keeping the water clean for everyone.”

Legislative setback and reapplication

The campaign experienced a significant interruption in December when Lund’s previously approved petition was cancelled following the implementation of Bill 14, legislation that amended Alberta’s citizen initiative framework.

In a Dec. 12 statement, Lund said Elections Alberta informed organizers the petition approval had been retroactively cancelled, requiring a new application under updated rules.

Bill 14 transferred certain decision-making powers from the chief electoral officer to the justice minister and nullified petitions not issued before the legislation took effect, while allowing proponents to reapply within a defined window.

Lund describes the process as disruptive but says organizers chose to continue.

“It reflects a chaos that we’ve seen in this government’s handling of the coal issue in general,” he says. “But that’s fine. We’re happy to comply with whatever requirements the government needs us to do in order to stop the coal mines.”

He says organizers used that time to improve their organization and prepare for the campaign.

A new notice of intent was filed on Dec. 19, and Elections Alberta confirmed on Jan. 27 that the revised application met legislative requirements. The formal notice of approval of initiative petition was issued, clearing the way for the next procedural steps.

Alberta’s chief electoral officer formally issued the petition on Feb. 10.

Mixed community response

Lund acknowledges that reaction in communities near proposed projects, including the Crowsnest Pass region, has been divided.

“The response from the people in Crowsnest Pass has been mixed, because some of them are extremely, loudly in favour of the mines,” he says, adding that others have privately expressed opposition.

He argues that the issue extends beyond local economic considerations, pointing to downstream water use and long-term environmental impacts.

“There’s a few hundred jobs involved, but that’s not the full story, because it’s going to affect the agricultural economy and it’s going to affect tourism,” he says.

“The biggest thing of all is that after the mining is finished, I guarantee that there will be a really, really large billion-dollar cleanup bill left for the taxpayer.”

Lund stresses that the opposition to new coal development is not confined to one political perspective. He describes a broad coalition that includes ranchers, irrigators, hunters, fishers and residents from both rural and urban communities, as well as First Nations, arguing the issue cuts across traditional political and regional lines.

Preparing for signature collection

With the application approved, the next steps include confirmation by the chief electoral officer that petition organizers have met the requirements to appoint a chief financial officer during the notice publication period.

That requirement has now been met, and chief electoral officer Gordon McClure has formally issued the citizen initiative petition.

The signature collection period runs from Feb. 11 to June 10, 2026.

Elections Alberta says registered canvassers, who must be eligible electors and follow the agency’s code of conduct, may begin collecting signatures during that 120-day window.

Meanwhile, organizers are recruiting volunteers and co-ordinating signing events across the province. Albertans interested in participating can find information through the campaign’s website waternotcoal.ca, including how to register as canvassers, support fundraising efforts and learn where signing opportunities will be available once collection begins.

Lund says organizers plan to host public signing events, set up stations at participating businesses and conduct door-to-door canvassing to gather signatures across the province.

A total of 177,732 valid signatures, which equals 10 per cent of ballots cast in the 2023 provincial election, are required for the petition to succeed. Elections Alberta will verify submitted signatures after the June 10 deadline.

What happens if the petition succeeds

Under Alberta’s citizen initiative rules, a successful petition would require the government to either introduce legislation reflecting the proposal or submit the question to a provincewide referendum.

“Our intention is for them to ban all future coal mining in the Rocky Mountains,” Lund says.

He emphasizes the campaign is focused specifically on water protection rather than opposition to resource development broadly.

“I’m not anti-resource development,” he says. “I know that we need resources and I know that we need jobs, but that doesn’t mean that every single project is a good idea, and this project is not a good idea.”

 

Strong local journalism matters to Canadian communities

This article was reported and written by Shootin’ the Breeze’s Local Journalism Initiative reporter. 

The Local Journalism Initiative is a federally funded program that supports original public-interest journalism in smaller or underserved communities across Canada. Content produced through the initiative is editorially independent and may be shared by other Canadian media outlets.

Stories like this are reported to keep readers informed and connected — and to reflect real Canadian life.

Alberta | AB, Coal Mining, Environment, Environmental Stewardship, Oldman River, Resource Development, water

Wooden gavel resting on legal books beside brass scales of justice

First Nations challenge Alberta independence petition in court

Alberta independence petition approval faces legal challenge from First Nations

Piikani Nation has launched a court challenge to Alberta’s chief electoral officer over the approval of a citizen initiative petition seeking a referendum on Alberta independence.

On Jan. 21, Piikani Nation, along with Siksika Nation and the Blood Tribe, filed the application in the Court of King’s Bench of Alberta for judicial review, following the controversial approval of the petition last month. The application argues that the petition question violates treaty rights and the Constitution.

The petition, led by Mitch Sylvestre, CEO of the Alberta Prosperity Project, asks: “Do you agree that the Province of Alberta should cease to be a part of Canada to become an independent state?”

Gordon McClure, the chief electoral officer, issued the petition Jan. 2 after determining that Sylvestre had met the legislative requirements, including appointing a chief financial officer, as required under the Citizen Initiative Act.

With the approval, official petition signature sheets were released and the signature collection period began, running through May 2, 2026.

The first reported signature was collected Jan. 6 at an event in Water Valley, and similar events have since been held across the province, including at Pincher Creek Community Hall on Jan. 28.

The move has reignited controversy following a Dec. 5, 2025, ruling by Court of King’s Bench Justice Colin Feasby. That decision struck down an earlier petition proposal by Sylvestre, finding it unconstitutional and beyond the powers granted under the Citizen Initiative Act.

Feasby ruled that a citizen-initiated independence referendum would contravene the Constitution, as secession would require a complete overhaul of the legal framework, including Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 and the protections of the numbered treaties.

The ruling also stressed that First Nations “cannot be ignored or bypassed” in discussions about Alberta’s future, highlighting the Blackfoot Nations’ unique role and treaty rights in shaping provincial governance.

While the December ruling was welcomed by Piikani Nation, which described it as a “victory for treaty rights,” the Alberta government subsequently introduced Bill 14, the Justice Statutes Amendment Act, 2025.

The legislation amended the Citizen Initiative Act, allowing a second petition question to be submitted — a step Piikani Nation and other Blackfoot Nations say undermines constitutional protections and disregards the original court ruling.

The Blackfoot Nations say the CEO’s approval of the second, nearly identical petition proposal was wrong and unconstitutional. They argue that, following Feasby’s decision, the CEO could not lawfully approve a second proposal on the same subject, as it contravenes Section 35 and the treaty rights of the Blackfoot Nations.

“Even under the amended law, the chief electoral officer is required to act consistently with the Constitution, Charter values and unwritten constitutional principles and could not authorize an unconstitutional question for a referendum,” their statement reads.

The nations also contend that the amendments to the law themselves are unconstitutional. The changes, they say, allow unconstitutional questions to be put to a vote and remove judicial oversight.

They call it an attempt to insulate decisions from court review, undermining sections 92 and 96 of the Constitution Act, 1867, Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 and unwritten constitutional principles, including the rule of law, democratic governance and the protection of minority rights.

The nations further argue that the Crown’s duty to consult was triggered because the chief electoral officer, acting as a Crown decision-maker, knew that approving a secession referendum could have serious adverse impacts on treaty and Aboriginal rights. However, no consultation occurred before the petition was issued.

The judicial review application filed by the three Blackfoot Nations seeks to quash the chief electoral officer’s Dec. 22 approval of Sylvestre’s petition and all steps flowing from it.

The nations also ask the court to declare the amended Citizen Initiative Act unconstitutional, nullify the petition issued on Jan. 2 and reaffirm that the Crown had a duty to consult with Indigenous communities before the CEO approved the second petition.

An interim injunction is also being requested to prevent further steps in the petition process until the case is resolved.

For his part, Sylvestre has described the petition as a “huge day” for supporters of Alberta independence. He has said the initiative represents a major legal milestone and urged Albertans to participate in the signature-gathering process.

Under provincial legislation, the petition must gather at least 177,732 valid signatures, which is equivalent to 10 per cent of the total votes cast in the 2023 provincial general election, for the initiative to proceed. Only original, physical signatures collected on official sheets issued by Elections Alberta are considered valid.

As the judicial review moves through the courts, Piikani Nation and the other Blackfoot Nations say they remain focused on protecting treaty rights and constitutional principles.

 

Strong local journalism matters to Canadian communities

This article was reported and written by Shootin’ the Breeze’s Local Journalism Initiative reporter. 

The Local Journalism Initiative is a federally funded program that supports original public-interest journalism in smaller or underserved communities across Canada. Content produced through the initiative is editorially independent and may be shared by other Canadian media outlets.

Stories like this are reported to keep readers informed and connected — and to reflect real Canadian life.

Alberta | AB, Alberta Separation | Independence | Bill 54, Citizen Initiative Act, First Nations Rights

A fountain pen writes the word “Petition” in bold, black ink on white paper.

Alberta independence referendum petition begins signature collection

Albertans can now sign a petition calling for a referendum on whether the province should separate from Canada and become an independent state.

Elections Alberta issued the citizen initiative petition Jan. 2, with signature collection running from Jan. 3 to May 2, according to Chief Electoral Officer Gordon McClure.

The proposed referendum question asks: “Do you agree that the Province of Alberta should cease to be a part of Canada to become an independent state?”

Proponent Mitch Sylvestre needs to collect 177,732 valid signatures for the petition to succeed. That represents 10 per cent of the total votes cast in the 2023 provincial general election.

Only registered canvassers may collect signatures during the 120-day signing period. Canvassers must be eligible electors and comply with Elections Alberta’s code of conduct.

Albertans wishing to sign must be approached by a registered canvasser and cannot sign online or download signature sheets independently. Digital signatures will not be accepted.

To sign the petition, eligible electors must produce one piece of government-issued photo identification with their name and current residential address, or two pieces of authorized identification with their name, one showing their current residential address.

Registered canvassers must witness each signature, view each elector’s identification to confirm eligibility, and sign each petition sheet.

Each elector may sign only once during the signature collection period. Canvassers will receive identification documents from Elections Alberta within two to three business days of their applications being approved.

Bill 14, the Justice Statutes Amendment Bill that took effect Dec. 11, 2025, introduced new rules for canvassers and electors signing petitions.

Sylvestre must submit all petition signature sheets to Elections Alberta by May 2. Any sheets received after that date will not be accepted.

Elections Alberta will verify the petition within 21 days of submission and report results on its website. If submitted on the final day, verification would be complete by May 23.

More information about the citizen initiative process, including proponent and canvasser responsibilities, financing rules and frequently asked questions, is available on the Elections Alberta website.

Elections Alberta is an independent, non-partisan office of the Legislative Assembly responsible for administering provincial elections, byelections and referenda.

 

Alberta | AB, Alberta Separation | Independence | Bill 54

A fountain pen writes the word “Petition” in bold, black ink on white paper.

Alberta independence referendum petition approved

A petition seeking a referendum on Alberta independence has been approved to begin collecting signatures.

Elections Alberta announced Dec. 22 that Chief Electoral Officer Gordon McClure approved the citizen initiative application, which asks: “Do you agree that the Province of Alberta should cease to be a part of Canada to become an independent state?”

The proponent is Mitch Sylvestre.

The approval comes just weeks after Elections Alberta verified a competing petition — the Alberta Forever Canada initiative — which gathered more than 400,000 signatures asking whether Alberta should remain part of Canada.

Under the Citizen Initiative Act, Elections Alberta will now determine if requirements for appointing a chief financial officer have been met. Once complete, the office will issue official signature sheets and set the collection period.

Signatures collected on unofficial forms will not be accepted, and canvassing cannot begin until the petition is formally issued.

The number of signatures required and collection period dates will be published on Elections Alberta’s website.

 

Alberta | AB, Alberta Separation | Independence | Bill 54, Forever Canadian Petition

A row of stacked white boxes labeled with various Alberta cities and towns, including Calgary and Edmonton, with people’s shadows cast on them. Signs above read "KEEP ALBERTA IN CANADA" and there is a Canadian flag in the background.

Alberta Forever Canada petition verified by Elections Alberta

Elections Alberta has confirmed the Alberta Forever Canada citizen initiative petition, seeking to make remaining in Canada official policy, has met all requirements under the Citizen Initiative Act.

Chief electoral officer Gordon McClure announced Monday that the petition, which asked whether Alberta should remain in Canada, satisfied Section 6 of the act as it existed on June 30, 2025.

The petition was launched by former Progressive Conservative deputy premier Thomas Lukaszuk, who received approval for the initiative on June 30. Signature collection began July 30 and concluded Oct. 28, when campaign volunteers delivered boxes of completed sheets to the Elections Alberta office in Edmonton.

The initiative, also known as the Forever Canadian petition, required 293,976 valid signatures — 10 per cent of the 2,939,762 electors on the post-2023 election list — to be considered successful.

Elections Alberta counted 438,568 valid signatures before applying the random statistical sampling process mandated under the act. After sampling, 404,293 signatures were verified, representing 13.6 per cent of an estimated 2,966,192 electors registered in the province as of May 2025. The verified count exceeded the threshold.

During the delivery of the petitions on Oct. 28, volunteer Chris Spearman of Pincher Creek said support was split evenly between Calgary and Edmonton residents and those in rural and smaller communities.

Verification was completed Nov. 15, ahead of the Dec. 27 deadline. Required financial reports were received Nov. 27 and deemed complete the following day.

Under Section 12(1) of the act, Elections Alberta submitted a copy of the petition’s policy proposal to the Speaker of the legislative assembly on Monday, triggering the next step in the process, in which the legislature must take a formal position on the issue.

Following the successful petition result, Spearman said he had “a tremendous feeling of satisfaction.”

He called the petition “a positive initiative in what until now was endless negativity.”

With the petition now successfully verified, Spearman recalled the challenges during his canvassing.

“Elections Alberta struggled to verify rural addresses, which meant delays in getting canvassers like myself registered,” he said.

He recalled the “memorable” moment when Lukaszuk delivered all the signed signature sheets to the Elections Alberta offices in Edmonton, and shared a message Lukaszuk sent volunteers after the verification.

“I want to extend a heartfelt congratulations and thank you for your support, mobilization and for fighting for Alberta’s future in Canada. This is your victory,” he wrote to Spearman.

He acknowledged the anxiety many felt amid “cheers for separation and the audible boos for Canadian unity from within the governing party’s ranks,” and said the petition’s success now “puts the ball in the premier’s court.”

Lukaszuk urged volunteers to stay engaged as the campaign prepares for its next phase and potential referendum, describing the group as organized, resilient and ready to continue advocating for national unity.

Spearman said “the next steps are really up to Premier Smith and her government to decide.”

“The initiative demonstrates that there is strong support within Alberta for staying in Canada,” he said. “In my opinion, the discussion of Alberta separatism will hurt Alberta economically.”

He believes that if a referendum on independence proceeds, the government “must use the question submitted by the Forever Canadian group.”

Another local volunteer, Carol Watt, who helped collect signatures for the petition at Ranchland Mall in Pincher Creek, said she felt “satisfied” after seeing the petition verified.

Watt described the experience as an opportunity to engage with a wide range of Albertans. She recalled that speaking with residents who were skeptical or strongly separatist required patience.

“I learned through the experience to eventually kind of agree with them and tell them, ‘Well, yes, of course, there are issues that we need to work on.’ That would usually de-escalate anybody and they’d eventually wind down,” Watt told Shootin’ the Breeze.

The Pincher Creek volunteer team was able to campaign indoors, which Watt said made the process easier.

“We had tables at the Co-op mall. We were fortunate. We didn’t have to put a sign up on our lawn. So that was very good,” she said. “We appreciated the Co-op administration allowing us to do that.”

Watt personally collected 214 signatures and estimated the Pincher Creek area contributed around 1,700 signatures in total.

“We probably had close to 1,000 just at the Co-op mall. We had two or three teams at different times,” she said. “Then we had several independent people who just did it on their own. There were four others, independently, who didn’t involve themselves at the Co-op.”

Looking ahead, Watt said volunteers are waiting to see how the premier responds to the initiative.

“She has some choices. It’s nice. It was ratified anyway,” she said.

Strong local journalism matters to Canadian communities

This article was reported and written by Shootin’ the Breeze’s Local Journalism Initiative reporter.

The Local Journalism Initiative is a federally funded program that supports original public-interest journalism in smaller or underserved communities across Canada. Content produced through the initiative is editorially independent and may be shared by other Canadian media outlets.

Stories like this are reported to keep readers informed and connected — and to reflect real Canadian life.

 

Alberta | AB, Carol Watt – Pincher Creek, Chris Spearman – Pincher Creek | Lethbridge, Forever Canadian Petition, Pincher Creek Co-op – Pincher Creek, Thomas Lukaszuk – Government of Alberta

Metallic letter blocks spell out "FUNDING" on a striped, light-colored surface, with several other scattered blocks and letters visible in the background.

Petition launched to end public funding for private schools

Alberta’s Chief Electoral Officer has issued a citizen initiative petition asking whether the government should stop allocating public funds to private schools.

Gordon McClure issued the petition for the “Alberta Funds Public Schools” citizen initiative on Oct. 14, according to Elections Alberta.

The petition asks: “Should the Government of Alberta end its current practice of allocating public funds to accredited independent (private) schools?”

The proponent has 120 days to collect 177,732 signatures — 10 per cent of votes cast in the 2023 provincial election. The signature collection period ends Feb. 11, 2026.

Only registered canvassers may collect signatures. Canvassers must be eligible electors and comply with the Canvasser Code of Conduct.

To be valid, signatures must be from eligible electors who sign during the 120-day period in the presence of a registered canvasser. Only original physical signatures are valid.

The proponent must submit all petition signature sheets to Elections Alberta by Feb. 11, 2026. Elections Alberta will verify the petition within 21 days and report results on its website.

More information about the citizen initiative process is available at elections.ab.ca.

Alberta | AB, Alberta Education, Education